Academic writing should be clear and objective. In the pursue of objectivity, some believe that by using the first person and introducing ‘I’ or ‘we’ in their text, the outcome will not sound as rigorous or formal. But attempting to avoid the first person may confuse readers, leaving them wondering ‘who does what?’ as we discussed in our article about the passive voice. Focusing on objectivity may also lead to anthropomorphism.
Continue reading “Anthropomorphism or the art
of humanising nonhuman subjects”
For years, we were told that in scientific writing we needed to use passive voice to sound formal, neutral and serious. More recently, the contrary philosophy bursted in: suddenly, passive voice had to be by all means avoided as it forces hiding the agent of the sentence and creates confusion. This paradigm shift left many of us in the doubt… is using passive voice in formal, scientific writing right or wrong?
Continue reading “Passive voice in scientific writing: angel or devil?”
In many ways, pursuing a PhD resembles running a
marathon: long distance, loneliness and fatigue are seemingly insurmountable
obstacles and nobody can hope to reach the end without adequate training. [Actually,
according to ancient literature and mythology, one non-professional athlete ran
the first Marathon in full armor in the Greek August weather (Lucas, 1976), but he paid the
effort with his life! This certainly does not set a positive example for all of
us, aspiring PhD holders…].
Continue reading “What if your PhD didn’t need to feel as long and tiring as a marathon?”
Let’s face it, us, scientists, are passionate about our job. We are usually delighted about carrying out our scientific tasks (experiments, simulations, reviews, etc.). But when it comes to writing our findings, the motivation goes down. We rarely feel we’re ready to write and we rarely feel in the mood to write… the consequence: when we sit down and are supposed to write, we rather start doing other things, we procrastinate. And of course procrastination comes guilt and frustration. Until the deadline dangerously approaches: then, in the last minute, creativity pops up. Well, let us break it for you: that’s not really last minute creativity, that’s stress and adrenaline doing their job.
In our Road to Bootcamp series of posts, we’ve already covered how starting writing your work early enough will let you fully benefit from the ‘magic’ of the writing process; therefore, reducing procrastination. In this post, we’ll focus on how creativity can be boosted—even when you’re convinced that you’re not in the mood to write.
Continue reading “Not in the mood to write? Why you should still show up, even if the muse doesn’t”
If you ask researchers about their main issues when it comes to writing, procrastination always appears on top of the list. There are several methods that can help you become an effective writer who seldom procrastinates (or who effectively procrastinates—did you know that that’s possible?), so on our Road to the Writing Bootcamp we will be dedicating a series of blog posts to this problem.
Why do we procrastinate when it comes to writing a scientific document? For multiple reasons, but many of them are related to the fear of the blank page, also known as writer’s block.
Continue reading “Want to procrastinate less and be an effective writer? Start writing your articles early enough”
We had the pleasure of interviewing Alessandro Parente, Professor at the Aero-Thermo-Mechanical Department of the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) and frequent member of juries for the FRIA and FNRS fellowships. He talked with us about his experience as a jury member and he gave us some precious tips for students preparing for this type of scholarships.
Continue reading “Succeeding at your scholarship interview:
Advice from Prof. Alessandro Parente”
Did you know that one in twelve Caucasian (8%), one in 20 Asian (5%) and one in 25 African (4%) males are colourblind? For the case of women, the probability goes down to one in 200 (0.5%). Still, this means that there are always colourblind people among the readers and the audience of the reports, papers and presentations that you produce. In academia, assuming that your next journal paper is reviewed by three white males (which is rather likely given the population in science nowadays), the probability that at least one of them is colourblind is 22%.
Continue reading “Are your documents colourblind friendly?”
As much as we love graphs, there are certain types that we don’t find effective. Graphs are all about displaying your data. To us pie charts are hiding your data. Check out the video for the alternatives.
Continue reading “The forbidden pie charts”
Voting day, while you head towards the election office, you are left wondering who would best represent your interests. You have read in the programs: “I’ll contribute to this…” or “I’ll improve that…” but nothing specific.
We very often see the same with candidates preparing for an interview: they remain superficial. Continue reading “You want to be selected, be specific”
I have the chance every year to supervise MSc theses on topics related to my research. While discussing with my colleagues, we realised there was a pattern in what the students did not get right during their thesis. Thanks to many iterations and feedback from these colleagues (I list them at the bottom), we have come up with the following 9 laws: Continue reading “9 laws towards successful MSc theses”
One of my favourite time of the day, aside from having quality time with my family, is when I discuss (read argue) with the PhD students I advise or train.
I am a big fan of feedback, as I believe this is the only way we can learn (aka deliberate practice). So I enjoy being challenged by the researchers as much as I like to challenge them.
This post includes a simple technique to challenge your advisor, it then explains why it is important to do so, and it finishes with how you can apply it to yourself. Continue reading “Is your supervisor your best opponent?”
You have just received the reviews for your article. After a long wait
, this is the most painful step. The main issue is that reviewers and authors don’t speak the same language. To speed up and ease this process, authors should address the comments so that reviewers can easily assess how their feedback has been tackled. What is then the most effective way of writing your rebuttal?
Continue reading “Effective template to write your answer to reviewers”
At the end of my PhD, I started receiving invitation to review articles. At that moment, I felt honoured as if I had received the membership card of a very selective club.
Later, as a postdoc and professor, the number of invitations increased while my time available for such type of tasks decreased. However, I noticed something interesting that I wanted to test with my students.
Continue reading “You want to write articles that get accepted? Do reviews.”
How many times did you come back from a conference with plenty of ideas and notes, having the motivation to act upon all these as soon as your were back in office? Continue reading “Get back from conferences with actionable notes”
You plan the interview for a scholarship or the text for a proposal and you make a statement. Unfortunately, you are not sure if it is entirely true. Who never felt like that. I sure did! What do you do as a response? You drop a weasel word to protect yourself from future criticism. Continue reading “Are you specific without being comprehensive?”
This post collects all the books I wish I knew about when I started my PhD. Don’t hesitate to contact me if you have found one that is not in this list. Continue reading “I wish I knew about these books when I started my PhD”
Getting your name on an article is becoming more and more important in the “publish or perish” era. Although I believe writing papers is an excellent objective for doing research, deciding who should be on the paper can become tricky in some cases.
Here is the result of an intense discussion during the team building (with ATM, FLOW and BURN research groups) in 2017. You can directly jump to the summary table at the end if you are in a hurry.
Continue reading “The authorship manifesto”
Many people might say that multi-tasking is the one thing they do well. In this hyper-connected world, we could think that this is the only way forward. My personal experience and the many readings I have done recently indicate the contrary. If you want to cut your work time by 50%, change to single-tasking. Continue reading “How to double your work efficiency with a simple technique”
I know this is not useful in my slide but when I send my slides, I want people to have these extra pieces of information.
You have probably used this excuse (used it myself too) when someone told you that your slides were a bit crowded with information. Continue reading “How to keep your slides effective while providing extra information when sending them?”
- You have probably been in many brainstorming meetings where you encountered one of the two following scenarios:
- “Dear colleagues, what are your ideas on this project…”, followed by a long silence, as if there was a brainstorming switch to turn on;
- You suggest an idea and immediately someone is saying: “No, this is not possible, it’s not a very good idea!”.
These two scenarios gather the two main pitfalls of effective brainstormings: priming and judging. Continue reading “The evolutionary brainstorming: do it as your brain was wired to do it”
I often need to review articles and give feedback on them. I find my feedback is most efficient when I can focus on the content (results, figures, etc) and the flow of the article. These aspects of the article are what interest the first author most, even if he or she is also happy to get a review of the typos or other secondary problems. Yet, more often than not, many of my comments are about things that can be more or less automatised. This post is a checklist for the common problems I encounter. Continue reading “Does your article address these important issues?”
A very inspiring video from Jean Luc Doumont on effective graphical displays reminded me how much it would be nice to have a simple tool able to produce them. Continue reading “The graphs the way they should be: effective”
I’m writing this post following a very interesting talk of Jean-luc Doumont on “clear, accurate, concise writing”. This was an updated version of his previous talk on effective written documents. Continue reading “Clear, accurate, concise writing”
The objective of this post is to bundle all the efficiency booster I use for my work. Don’t hesitate to submit the gems you find and they will end up here after a trial period. Continue reading “Boost your work efficiency with the following tools and techniques”
You might have sometimes difficulty to communicate with your supervisor. He or she is often away in meetings, never there at the right moment and leaning over your shoulder just when you are busy. This might be a bit exaggerated but let’s have a look into how you can supercharge your communication. Continue reading “Do you have problems communicating or meeting with your supervisor?”
As I covered in another post, writing your paper begins when you start working on a topic. At some point, you’ll want to submit it. When approaching the last steps towards that point, it is effective to apply the following timeline. Continue reading “Are you following these steps when submitting your paper?”
After submitting your manuscript, the hard wait for the review starts. You could think that everything is handled perfectly on a first-in-first-out basis. But this is unfortunately not the case. It is not an easy job to be an editor, it takes a lot of effort, time investment and organisation. So you have to do everything to facilitate their work and this requires some follow-up from your side. Here are the most important steps. Continue reading “Are you lost after the submission of your manuscript?”
We will cover here some good practice when writing your manuscripts with . To make sure the persons who review your manuscript before submission (more details) pay attention to the content of your article instead of the little problems, it is worth following these tips. Continue reading “Are you using these time-saving features of LaTeX?”
When doing a Master Thesis with me, I expect the following: Continue reading “Instructions for Master Thesis”